Jeromie Beasley · What Tesla Saw · Mixer

What Tesla Saw

His laws, his numbers, and what they fix, run live. Every panel is computed in your browser from his own figures, put through laws he stated himself: the Colorado Springs Notes (June 1899 to January 1900), his 112 US patents, and his own published accounts.

Blue is computed from his numbers by his own laws; amber is his own record. Built from the paper of September 2026.
n = 1/(2π√LC)every circuit has its own period
m = pL/R = p/2γ10,530 on 2 January 1900
50,550 · 99,480his November coils ring in an octave
5.89 per secondhis "six per second" earth tone
25–70 km/hthe storm of 3 July 1899
9 × 10 = 90one more jet than the other
His law · n = 1/(2π√(LC)) · the Notes, 3 July 1899

Twice the tone takes a quarter of the capacity

Every circuit has "a period of vibration of its own analogous to the period of vibration of a weighted spring" (568,178). On 3 July 1899 his secondary rang at "n = 20,700 per sec. approx." with 15 jars a side. The ground waves wanted 48 jars a side, more than the transformer could charge, and "An octave would require only 12 jars on each side ... the octave vibration had only 1/4 of the energy." Move the jars and watch his two laws do the arithmetic.

his circuit: the charge swings between the jars and the coil
the tone against the jars, and the energy each holds
tone n (per second)
against 48 jars
energy against 48 jars
wave at 186,000 mi/s
His laws: n = 1/(2π√(LC)) (the Notes, more than 50 times) and ½CV² (512,340; the Notes). The octave rule is proved in Lean: octave_quarter_capacity and energy_scales_with_capacity (TeslaCore_v3). Blue is computed from his numbers by his laws; amber is his own record.
His law · m = pL/R · 462,418, 685,012, the Notes

The magnifying factor is the tone over twice its decay

His rule: the rise is "directly proportionate to" inductance "and inversely to" resistance. On 2 January 1900 his extra coil had p = 585,000 and L = 0.018, so m = 585,000 × 0.018 ÷ 1 = 10,530, "falling to about 10" with the lamps' 1,000 ohms. Written as a complex tone ω = √(p² − γ²) − iγ with γ = R/2L, the same number is m = p/2γ: how many swings it rings before it fades.

the ring-down after one push: blue computed, envelope e^(−γt)
m = pL/R against R, with his two cases
decay rate γ = R/2L
complex tone ω
m = p/2γ = pL/R
rings to 1/e in
Reproduction note: "non-Hermitian" and "complex tone" are our words, not his; the numbers are his. m·2γ = p is proved in Lean (magnification_is_tone_over_decay). His cooling patent 685,012, "intensifying and prolonging the electrical oscillations": lowering R pulls the imaginary part toward zero.
His measured coils, November 1899

Two circuits tuned alike, coupled tight, ring at two tones

He measured every part: secondary 9,023,000 cm and 1.382 ohm, primary 230,945 cm, mutual inductance 851,021 and 863,313 cm, secondary capacity 622 cm. Tuning the primary by his rule L₁C₁ = L₂C₂ takes 30 of his 0.0009 mfd bottles, and each circuit alone rings at 63,700 per second. Coupled at k = 0.59 they ring at about 50,500 and 100,000 per second, the two numbers he published in 1900.

response of his secondary to a drive in the primary
the two tones as the coupling changes
coupling k and 1 − k²
lower tone (per second)
upper tone (per second)
ratio of the tones
His July factor "1 − M²/NL ... nearly 0.6"; from November k = 0.590 and 0.598, 1 − k² = 0.65 and 0.64. His 1900 figures: "the fundamental vibration, which is fifty thousand per second", coils answering at "twice that number". That the 1900 photographs used this November setup is untested. Lean: coupled_pair_two_tones, coupling_his_first_M, thirty_bottles. The meeting point near k = 0.004 is in our language (non-Hermitian), not his.
His law · 593,138 (1897), 787,412, the Notes

Zero at one end, maximum at the other

A grounded coil about a quarter wave long: "at one terminal the potential would be zero and at the other maximum." Such a wire rings only at 1, 3, 5, 7 ... times its lowest tone. His own wire lengths and tones, put through speed = 4 × length × frequency, give the speed each wire would need, against his 186,000 miles per second.

the standing wave on a grounded wire
the speed each of his wires would need
his wire
his tone (per second)
speed it would need
against 186,000 mi/s
For the slow wire he gave the reason: "owing to the large capacity (distributed) in the secondary the vibration was much slower". For the outdoor coil he held the tuning off on purpose, because closer tuning broke the lamps. For 2 January his records give no reason: either the frequency was about 4% lower, or the wave ran about 4% faster. Both stand. Lean: quarter_wave_odd_tones.
Patent 787,412 (filed 1900)

One geometry: across at the speed of light, around at π/2 times it

His figures: a wave train of "0.08484 of a second" at "about four hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and forty kilometers per second" over the surface, the earth's diameter "an odd multiple of the quarter wave length", and "The lowest frequency would appear to be six per second." With π = 3.1416, c = 300,000 km/s and D = 12,726 km they are one picture.

the diameter crossed at c; the footprint on the surface
the tones his odd-quarter-wave rule allows
surface speed
there and back
footprint × time
lowest tone
Proved in Lean (TeslaCore_v3): earth_surface_speed 471,240 = (3.1416/2) × 300,000; earth_round_trip 0.08484 = 2 × 12,726 ÷ 300,000; earth_once_round 471,240 × 0.08484 = 3.1416 × 12,726; earth_lowest_tone 1 ÷ (2 × 0.08484) lies between 5 and 6. Even multiples are not allowed by his rule.
The Notes, the 1904 article, and 787,412 together

A pattern pinned to the storm sweeps past a still detector

"It showed clearly the existence of stationary waves ... the point where the lightning struck the ground would be a nodal point." His detector restarted about every half hour as the storm drew off to about 300 km, and his patent gives the earth waves as 25 to 70 km long. On his nodal reading each restart is the storm moving on half a wave.

the stationary wave, pinned to the storm
what his fixed detector registers
storm speed
the wave vibrates
from 80 km to 300 km
restarts over that stretch
Half-wave reading: 25 to 70 km per hour, 3 to 9 hours, 6 to 18 restarts. Full-wave reading: 50 to 140 km per hour. Frequency c/λ = 4,300 to 12,000 per second, under his limit of 20,000. His Notes give no clock times, so they do not separate the two readings. Lean: storm_speed.
The Notes, 23 October and 11 November 1899

The rise is the wire it was threaded on

A ball alone loses capacity as it rises off the ground. His readings rose as he slid it up the vertical wire. Rebuilt from his coil, wire and ball, the circuit gives the rise: low down the coil top and the wire above crowd the ball; at the free end of the wire it takes the end's charge.

his arrangement: coil, No. 10 wire, the ball
capacity the ball adds, against height
ball centre
computed, the circuit
his reading nearest
ball alone, free
Checks before any answer: the 30-inch ball alone gives 38.11 cm (C = r = 38.1); 50 ft of No. 10 wire on the coil gives 81 cm against his 81.5 by formula. For the 18-inch ball his top figure is more than twice the model's rise; his records name streamers and eddy currents in unslit foil, both untested.
The Notes, 5 to 26 November 1899

His own doubt: the fundamental or the first octave

For the iron-pipe structure he computed 464.8 cm from its parts. By resonance he read 339.7, 311.2, 310.6, 304.7, 305.0 and, with a new coil, 267.5 cm; with the rounded hood about 358 cm. On 26 November: "It now seems that the tuning ... was made to the first octave instead of to the fundamental tone. This is to be ascertained."

his readings, his computed value
the simple parts: straight wire, reading against his formula
his computed value
his readings
computed ÷ read
straight wire, read ÷ formula
His computed 464.8 cm lies between the fundamental reading and the octave reading; neither matches it. His records stop at "This is to be ascertained". On straight wire the method was sound: 77.4 and 83.2 against 81.5 cm, and 85.85 against 84.4 cm.
Patent 609,246 (1898)

One more jet in one set than the other

His mercury break: jets of 9 and of 10 give "ninety makes and breaks" a turn. His rule, "one more nozzle in one set than in the other", makes every meeting a separate instant. Counts that share a factor meet fewer times: 8 and 10 give only 40.

the two sets: a flash at every meeting
the separate meeting instants in one turn
separate meetings a turn
the product a × b
shared factor
his rule
Proved in Lean: nine_ten_jets (90) and eight_ten_jets (40). Two symmetric sets of a and b meet at lcm(a, b) separate instants a turn, which is a × b exactly when they share no factor.
Patents 1,061,206 (1913) and 1,209,359 (1916)

One third or one half: which drag law

The turbine patent says the torque goes as the square of the fluid's relative speed, and that the work is greatest at half the fluid's speed. With work = torque × runner speed, the square law peaks at one third. Half is what his later law gives: drag "exactly proportionate to its velocity relative to the system" in a narrow gap.

the disk runner in the fluid
work against runner speed, for each drag law
work, square law
work, linear law
best runner speed
the equal split, 416,194
Proved in Lean: turbine_square_law_third and turbine_linear_law_half, each with its equality case. The linear law's u(V − u) is his equal split (416,194): with a fixed total the product is greatest when the parts are equal, 50 × 50 = 2,500 against 90 × 10 = 900 (equal_split).
What his records fix, and what stays open

The record

Fixed by his own numbers and his own laws, then the questions his records leave open. Nothing here is interpretation; where two readings fit his numbers, both stand.

Fixed

What his numbers fixFrom
The 3–4 July 1899 storm moved at 25 to 70 km per hour; the earth waves vibrated 4,300 to 12,000 times a secondNotes, 1904 article, 787,412; half-wave reading (full wave: 50 to 140 km per hour)
His earth figures are one geometry: diameter 12,726 km crossed at 300,000 km/s, surface speed π/2 times that, lowest tone 5.89 per second787,412; proved in Lean
His octave rule is exact: twice the frequency takes a quarter of the capacity and holds a quarter of the energyNotes, 3 Jul 1899; proved in Lean
The ball's rise with height is the wire it was threaded on; within 2.4% at the top for the 30-inch ballNotes, 23 Oct and 11 Nov 1899; the rebuilt circuit
His structure: computed 464.8 cm, read 267 to 358 cm, four times that if tuned to the octave; neither matchesNotes, Nov 1899
His straight-wire capacities agree with his formula within a few per cent; the resonance method was soundNotes, 28 Oct, 10 and 16 Nov 1899
On 2 January 1900 his wire was 4% longer than the quarter wave: either the frequency was 4% lower or the wave ran 4% fasterNotes, 2 Jan 1900; both stand
His measured November coils ring at two tones an octave apart, about 50,500 and 100,000 per secondNotes, Nov 1899; his 1900 figures
His condensers, controllers, quarter-wave rule and magnifying rule were fixed before Colorado and carried into the patents after it1886–1928 patents

Still open

OpenWhy
Which single wavelength belonged to 3–4 JulyThe patent gives the range from "a large number of observations"
Whether his structure tunings were to the fundamental or the octave"This is to be ascertained"; nothing later settles it
The rise in the ball readings beyond the conductor model, largest for the 18-inch ballStreamers and eddy currents in unslit foil; both untested
Ground or air at long range: the earth alone, or the earth with the upper atmosphere as a second plateTesla's pages and Marinčić (1978) side by side; untested
His 1916 interview in fullOnly excerpts seen
The New York notes of 1900–1901Located (Nikola Tesla Museum, 2008), not read